ai research AI Trends Insider autonomous cars Robotics Self Driving Cars Tech

Economic Commodity Debate: The Case of AI Self-Driving Cars

Economic Commodity Debate: The Case of AI Self-Driving Cars

By Lance Eliot, the AI Tendencies Insider

Will AI self-driving automobiles be an financial commodity?

That’s the scuttlebutt today that some are predicting. There appears to be a rumor circulating which asserts that when we truly obtain true AI self-driving automobiles, it is going to be a commoditized enterprise. I’ve had each business outsiders and insiders ask me about this matter, doing so on the conferences I’ve been talking at, and even at native occasions and collegial dinners. The rumor seems to be gaining velocity.

I’d wish to deal with the argument that precipitated that sort of assertion.

Backside-line: I don’t purchase into the commoditization logic and nor rhetoric.

For my part, people who appear to be fostering such a sign are regrettably considerably misguided of their logic and have maybe fallen into some logic-traps that may hasten their perception within the notion. There are others which might be going together with the notion because it sounds alluring and the surface-level rationale seems to be viable at a fast look. My herein evaluation at a deeper degree means that the commoditized-camp and its converts may need to rethink their stance.

In fact, we don’t any of us know for positive what the longer term will bear out, however I’d be prepared to wager that AI self-driving automobiles usually are not more likely to grow to be commodities.

First, let’s begin the dialogue by contemplating what an financial commodity is. We have to all considerably agree on the definition of an financial commodity in order that we will then attempt to determine whether or not true AI self-driving automobiles will turn into one. If we can’t comply with a definition, we’ll be arguing previous one another and by no means see eye-to-eye.

Usually, an financial commodity is taken into account any financial good or service for which there’s an abundance of fungibility, which signifies that situations of the great or service are primarily indistinguishable from one another and consumers don’t understand any materials distinctions concerning the good or service. Discover that I’ve talked about that it may be both a superb or service, although by-and-large it’s often a superb or product that will get into the commoditization class slightly than a service.

Why not providers, you may ask? When providing a service, there’s ceaselessly a larger probability that the service being provided is differentiated, together with how and who presents it, and thus they are going to be distinguishable within the minds of consumers.

I’d want a plumber to return over to my home to cope with my leaking faucet. The Ace Plumbers service supplies so-called smell-good plumbers that may show-up on-time and do a superb job for an inexpensive worth. The Zany Plumbers service has plumbers which might be sometimes late to reach, they typically fail to repair the plumbing drawback, and they’re soiled and gruff to cope with and cost an arm and a leg to do the plumbing work. It’s comparatively obvious that we might distinguish these plumbing service suppliers from one another, subsequently we’d say that the plumbing service isn’t commoditized.

When it comes to items, I’m positive that you simply probably know that always occasions merchandise akin to gasoline, sugar, grains, are known as commodities. They’re referred to as commodities as a result of presumably the consumers of these merchandise don’t see any materials elements that differentiates them (by this I imply that gasoline just isn’t differentiated from different gasolines, sugar is just not differentiated from different sugars, and so forth.). These commodities are sometimes bought in bulk to these within the provide chain that may finally get them to the buyer. This tends to squeeze out revenue margins as a result of there isn’t any specific issue that makes any higher or worse than the opposite.

Provided that they’re in any other case thought-about equals, the suppliers of these commodities are absolutely on the whim of the marketplace when it comes to pricing they usually can’t attempt to regulate their worth greater based mostly on their product per se. If I’m promoting a thousand gallons of gasoline in bulk, and another person is promoting a thousand gallons of gasoline in bulk, and if there isn’t a differentiation between our gasoline product, it then comes down to cost. I can’t attempt to have a better worth on this circumstance because the purchaser of the majority gasoline can be unwise to purchase from me at a better worth once they can get the identical factor from somebody with a lower cost.

Dealing in commodities is usually a tough enterprise. Canine eat canine, so to talk. I’m reminded of the well-known line by Karl Marx, by which he said: “From the style of wheat, it isn’t potential to inform who produced it, a Russian serf, a French peasant or an English capitalist” (for this quote and different financial theories, see the well-known e-book “Capital: The Means of Circulation of Capital,” revealed in 1885 by Fridrich Engels and with Karl Marx’s notes, which supplies the core parts of Karl Marx’s financial theories).

Briefly, commodities are indistinguishable within the minds of consumers. This suggests that the services or products might be provided by a number of sellers and but the customer doesn’t acknowledge any variations concerning the services or products being bought by these sellers. The customer can presumably select any of the sellers and might be shopping for the identical services or products. If that’s the case, it turns into a struggle on pricing among the many sellers. Whomever can promote the services or products on the lowest possible worth would garner the consumers to purchase from them.

Understand that there are a number of caveats about this notion of commoditization.

The customer needs to be savvy sufficient to understand that the services or products is certainly a commodity. Typically occasions, a purchaser won’t know this and can subsequently proceed to pay a better worth for one thing that in principle they’ve overpaid on worth.

Experiencing Ace Plumbers vs Zany Plumbers

The tap in my home is operating wildly and water is flowing out all over the place. Yikes, I’m in a panic. I have to get a plumber pronto. I do a fast on-line search and up pops the Ace Plumbers and the Zany Plumbers. So far as I do know, they’re each equal. I can get the identical plumbing providers from both one. I look shortly to see which of them has a lower cost. The pricing posted by Zany Plumbers is decrease than the Ace Plumbers and so I contact them and organize for them to return to my home.

Little did I understand that the Zany Plumbers are in truth differentiable from the Ace Plumbers, recall my earlier description of the 2 plumbing providers during which I depicted that the Ace Plumbers have been extra skilled and the Zany Plumbers a lot much less so. The plumber that exhibits up from Zany Plumbers is a depressing, grumpy, ill-prepared dolt and fails to repair my faucet correctly. I didn’t understand beforehand that the 2 plumbing providers weren’t commoditized.

Thus, the customer must be astute sufficient to know when a services or products is certainly commoditized:

If the customer fails to comprehend one thing is a commodity, the customer could be fooled or lulled into paying a better worth when there’s presumably no justification in doing so.

If the customer believes one thing is a commodity when actually it isn’t (it’s non-commoditized), the customer may purchase at a worth that appears equal to the opposite sellers pricing, however in the long run get ripped-off by having gotten a lesser services or products than they might have gotten from one other vendor.

In a market of products and providers, it may be troublesome for a purchaser to know what a commodity is and what’s not a commodity.

There are sellers which may attempt to have the customer consider there’s a commodity in that good or service, when there truly is just not. The Zany Plumbers in all probability needs you to assume that each one plumbing providers are the identical, hoping that you’ll decide them, and they’re both going to attempt to confuse you into believing that each one plumbing providers are the identical or they anticipate you gained’t analysis properly sufficient to know.

This jogs my memory of the bottled water business. I knew a top-level government at one of many largest bottled water companies. He advised me over dinner one night time that he couldn’t consider that folks assume that there’s any distinction between the bottled water merchandise. It’s clear water in a plastic bottle. He claimed that the water is admittedly about the identical regardless of which bottled water you decide. The core product, in the event you think about it to be the water, he expressed was actually a commodity.

To attempt to get consumers to consider it’s a non-commodity, the bottled water firm formed the bottle in a particular method and slapped flashy graphics and colours onto the outside of the bottle. Additionally they boldly indicated that their water had solely a miniscule quantity of a sure type of iron in it, however he informed me that all the bottled waters have about the identical quantity. Moreover, he indicated that the iron content material actually didn’t matter as a result of it wasn’t a well being concern and had nothing to do with any type of distinction in style.

In that sense, they have been making an attempt to make a commodity appear to be a non-commodity. Why? As a result of it might permit them to persuade consumers into shopping for their product over the opposite sellers, and probably additionally pay a better worth when doing so. If the bottled waters are actually a commodity, the consumers must be wanting solely at worth and ignore the form of the bottle and its flashy exterior.

For these of you which might be within the bottled water enterprise, please don’t write me to complain that I’ve steered that the bottled water enterprise is a commodity business. There are plenty of companies that the identical argument may be made that the core services or products is actually in a way a commodity, and but the sellers in that business attempt to package deal or painting their services or products as a non-commodity, inducing consumers to consider that the services or products will not be commoditized. I’m not singling out bottled water and nor am I claiming that bottled water is a commodity – I hope that may calm the nerves of these of you in that business.

Let’s take the attitude of the vendor for a second.

If you are able to do so, as a vendor of a services or products, you’d probably want to supply a non-commodity services or products. This is able to will let you then cost maybe extra in your services or products than others, since consumers could be prepared to pay extra, assuming that they understand your services or products variations as valued.

What might be much more galling is to be a vendor in a non-commoditized services or products whereby the consumers don’t understand that it isn’t a commodity. Think about the plight of the Ace Plumbers. They know that they go to the difficulty to have good smelling plumbers which are skilled. Maybe this prices them extra to rearrange. They cost the identical worth as say Zany Plumbers. However, consumers that don’t know are fooled or lulled into assuming that Ace Plumbers and Zany Plumbers are indistinguishable when it comes to the plumbing service, so consumers go to Zany Plumbers at occasions once they may need been higher off to go to Ace Plumbers.

Suppose certainly that Zany Plumbers pricing is identical as Ace Plumbers. This suggests that the customer is overpaying for what they might get from Ace Plumbers. Sadly, if consumers don’t understand this, it’s attainable that Ace Plumbers is dropping enterprise to Zany Plumbers, and as a double whammy the Ace Plumbers has larger prices of providing their plumbing service. It’s not truthful! These darned consumers should be extra differentiating of their shopping for.

Right here’s the mess we’ve got then about consumers and sellers:

  •         Consumers might be ill-informed and subsequently consider a commodity is a non-commodity, or they will consider a non-commodity is a commodity.
  •         Sellers is perhaps tempted to make a commodity look like a non-commodity, or make a non-commodity look like a commodity.

I point out these elements about purchaser and vendor perceptions and psychology as a result of it’s critical for the notion of commodities. In principle, one may argue that each one consumers are all the time all understanding, and all sellers are all the time all figuring out, however that’s not essentially the case. In economics, there’s a whole ongoing space of debate and analysis concerning the rational and irrational conduct of people, which performs into how the real-world works when it comes to the promoting and shopping for of products and providers.

For my dialogue about rational versus irrational human conduct, see my article:

For the position of greed in human conduct, see my article:

For a way curiosity impacts human conduct, see my article:

For a way group conduct impacts human judgement, see my article:

What does this need to do with AI self-driving automobiles?

On the Cybernetic AI Self-Driving Automotive Institute, we’re creating AI software program for self-driving automobiles. As talked about earlier, there are some rumors floating round that inevitably the business of AI self-driving automobiles might be a commodity.

In essence, it has been postulated that AI self-driving automobiles can be commoditized and so the consumers of AI self-driving automobiles will presumably contemplate any AI self-driving automotive to be indistinguishable from some other AI self-driving automobiles. There can be no model or function or different side or issue that might trigger the consumers of AI self-driving automobiles to think about one to be higher than or worse than another AI self-driving automotive.

Why would that matter?

If such a prediction is right, it implies that finally the AI self-driving automotive market shall be solely decided by worth. Consumers of AI self-driving automobiles will merely take a look at the worth to determine which AI self-driving automotive to purchase. This additionally signifies that the auto makers and tech companies which might be promoting AI self-driving automobiles are competing solely on worth. As I discussed earlier than, worth alone is a canine eat canine world.

Inside the auto makers and tech companies, in the event that they have been in a commoditized market area, the one factor they will presumably do is attempt to reduce their prices as little as attainable, which then turns into their solely technique of competitors. I say this beneath the idea that if commoditized, they’re unable to distinguish their AI self-driving automobiles by way of another means, since by definition we’re saying that there isn’t a distinction, i.e., all of them have the identical options and capabilities.

One would additionally assume that if commoditized, the worth of AI self-driving automobiles will all end-up across the similar worth. There isn’t a worth to a purchaser that pays a better worth for an AI self-driving automotive from one auto maker versus one other. To promote their AI self-driving automobiles, an auto maker or tech agency would wish to take care of a worth near the remainder of the marketplace. Presumably, the marketplace will attain some extent of a pricing that gives some financial incentive for the auto makers and tech companies to remain out there, however solely such that the worth is stored underneath strain as a result of all the opposite auto makers and tech companies are vying on worth too.

Various Ranges of Self-Driving Automobiles

Earlier than I leap into the fray and clarify why the above state of affairs concerning the commoditizing of AI self-driving automobiles is very unlikely, I’d like to offer some useful and instrumental background about AI self-driving automobiles that’s important to this dialogue.

I’d wish to first make clear and introduce the notion that there are various ranges of AI self-driving automobiles. The topmost degree is taken into account Degree 5. A Degree 5 self-driving automotive is one that’s being pushed by the AI and there’s no human driver concerned. For the design of Degree 5 self-driving automobiles, the auto makers are even eradicating the fuel pedal, brake pedal, and steering wheel, since these are contraptions utilized by human drivers. The Degree 5 self-driving automotive isn’t being pushed by a human and neither is there an expectation that a human driver shall be current within the self-driving automotive. It’s all on the shoulders of the AI to drive the automotive.

For self-driving automobiles lower than a Degree 5, there have to be a human driver current within the automotive. The human driver is at present thought-about the accountable celebration for the acts of the automotive. The AI and the human driver are co-sharing the driving process. Regardless of this co-sharing, the human is meant to stay absolutely immersed into the driving process and be prepared always to carry out the driving activity. I’ve repeatedly warned concerning the risks of this co-sharing association and predicted it’ll produce many untoward outcomes.

For my general framework about AI self-driving automobiles, see my article:

For the degrees of self-driving automobiles, see my article:

For why AI Degree 5 self-driving automobiles are like a moonshot, see my article:

For the risks of co-sharing the driving process, see my article:

Let’s focus herein on the true Degree 5 self-driving automotive. A lot of the feedback apply to the lower than Degree 5 self-driving automobiles too, however the absolutely autonomous AI self-driving automotive will obtain probably the most consideration on this dialogue.

Right here’s the standard steps concerned within the AI driving process:

  • Sensor knowledge assortment and interpretation
  • Sensor fusion
  • Digital world mannequin updating
  • AI motion planning
  • Automotive controls command issuance

One other key facet of AI self-driving automobiles is that they are going to be driving on our roadways within the midst of human pushed automobiles too. There are some pundits of AI self-driving automobiles that regularly seek advice from a Utopian world by which there are solely AI self-driving automobiles on the general public roads. At present there are about 250+ million typical automobiles in the USA alone, and people automobiles usually are not going to magically disappear or turn out to be true Degree 5 AI self-driving automobiles in a single day.

Certainly, using human pushed automobiles will final for a few years, doubtless many many years, and the arrival of AI self-driving automobiles will happen whereas there are nonetheless human pushed automobiles on the roads. This can be a essential level since because of this the AI of self-driving automobiles wants to have the ability to cope with not simply different AI self-driving automobiles, but in addition deal with human pushed automobiles. It’s straightforward to check a simplistic and fairly unrealistic world during which all AI self-driving automobiles are politely interacting with one another and being civil about roadway interactions. That’s not what will be occurring for the foreseeable future. AI self-driving automobiles and human pushed automobiles will want to have the ability to deal with one another.

For my article concerning the grand convergence that has led us to this second in time, see:

See my article concerning the moral dilemmas dealing with AI self-driving automobiles:

For potential laws about AI self-driving automobiles, see my article:

For my predictions about AI self-driving automobiles for the 2020s, 2030s, and 2040s, see my article:

Returning to the dialogue about whether or not or not AI self-driving automobiles will develop into a commodity, I’d now wish to deal with the query head-on.

Monolith Fable

I’ll begin with the monolith fantasy.

You may concentrate on Arthur C. Clarke’s well-known quote or regulation: “Any sufficiently superior know-how is indistinguishable from magic.”

This quote is contained in Clarke’s well-known essay “Hazards of Prophecy: The Failure of Creativeness” revealed in 1962 and included his so-called three legal guidelines, which by the best way he jokingly stored to 3 legal guidelines since Sir Isaac Newton had three legal guidelines and it appeared that if Newton solely wanted three then Clarke figured he wanted solely three.

In any case, the rationale I supply Clark’s quote is that should you take the point of view that each one AI is actually the identical, and also you don’t differentiate any variations between AI parts, you’re apt to make the assertion that finally AI self-driving automobiles can be a commodity.

Contemplate toasters for a second. I’d declare that each one toasters are the identical. Magically, they’re able to make toast for me. I don’t essentially know the way it works. All I do know is that a toaster makes me toast. As such, are we to imagine that toasters are a commodity? Are all toasters indistinguishable from one another?

In the event you say that sure, toasters are a commodity, I’d wish to level out that it’s by some accounts a billion greenback international market with at the least 20 main gamers they usually appear to consider that they’re promoting a non-commodity. Pricing ranges fairly a bit. Options vary fairly a bit.

Once I tried to purchase a toaster the opposite day, I used to be almost overwhelmed with my choices. Toast two items of bread or three? Toast bread and in addition hotdog buns? Old style timer or modern-day IoT (Web of Issues) that connects together with your smartphone or smartwatch? Anti-jam functionality or no anti-jam? Straightforward to wash or do you need to take aside the toaster with a screw driver simply to maintain it clear?

Earlier than I attempted to purchase a toaster, I assumed that it was a monolith within the sense that no toaster could possibly be distinguishable from another toaster. All toasters have to be the identical, I assumed.

I consider that a few of these arguing that AI self-driving automobiles might be a commodity market are assuming that each one AI self-driving automobiles would be the similar.

That is a simple psychological lure to fall into.

When you aren’t conscious of what the AI goes to do for AI self-driving automobiles, you possibly can readily make a false assumption that the AI would be the similar for all AI self-driving automobiles.

In case you aren’t contemplating the truth that the AI is being developed by totally different auto makers and tech companies, and subsequently the character of the AI and what it does goes to be is totally different throughout these auto makers and tech companies, you may falsely assume that all the AI self-driving automobiles may have the identical options.

Let’s think about the character of Degree 5 AI self-driving automobiles. I’m selecting these since they’re the true AI self-driving automobiles within the sense of being presumably absolutely autonomous.

Something lower than a Degree 5 AI self-driving automotive is actually axiomatically a non-commodity. I don’t assume anybody can particularly debate that time. I say this as a result of on the lower than Degree 5, the auto makers and tech companies can select what sorts of AI options they need to embrace into their AI self-driving automotive. That is just like at present’s automobiles which have quite a lot of superior auto driving options. One auto maker gives auto driving for the brakes, whereas one other won’t. One auto maker gives lane correction for his or her cruise management, one other won’t. And so forth.

It will proceed for Degree 2, Degree three, and Degree four of AI self-driving automobiles.

Certainly, for Degree four self-driving automobiles, the auto makers and tech companies can outline their very own ODD (Operational Design Domains). One auto maker may point out that their AI self-driving automotive works within the rain however not the snow, and they also outline an ODD for that facet. One other auto maker may point out their AI self-driving works within the rain and the snow, in order that they outline an ODD for that facet.

You, the customer of an AI self-driving automotive, try to determine which of the Degree four AI self-driving automobiles to purchase. One which has an ODD that features rain however not snow, and the opposite that handles each rain and snow. Which do you decide?

Definitely, it’s clear minimize that you’re differentiating the 2 choices.

In case you are the kind of person who lives in a spot that will get snow, I’d guess that you simply’d purchase the AI self-driving automotive that has the ODD that features snow driving. For somebody like me that lives in Los Angeles (LA), trace we don’t get snow in downtown LA, I’d in all probability choose to get the AI self-driving automotive that doesn’t have the snow driving functionality (beneath the idea that the one being provided that can’t deal with the snow is probably going a lower cost or that the worth someway encompasses the shortage of snow driving in some method or one other).

Okay, so we have to then solely consider the Degree 5 AI self-driving automobiles, since we’re agreed (hopefully) that something lower than a Degree 5 may be differentiated because of the facet that the auto makers can select to incorporate no matter AI options they want to embrace or have out there to incorporate (and moreover that not all auto makers could have the identical capabilities to incorporate, with some having some options able to go and others not).

As soon as we get to true AI self-driving automobiles, Degree 5, will all of them embody the identical AI capabilities?

That’s a simple reply: No.

An auto maker or tech agency can have a real Degree 5 AI self-driving automotive that has totally different AI options than these of another Degree 5 AI self-driving automotive made by one other auto maker or tech agency.

Suppose I’m promoting an AI self-driving automotive that may certainly drive you round with none human driver wanted. It’s a Degree 5 AI self-driving automotive. Absolutely meets the SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) definition for a Degree 5.

My AI self-driving automotive has a strong Pure Language Processing (NLP) function that permits the AI to work together with the occupants of the self-driving automotive. It not solely asks the place you need to go, it additionally carries on numerous conversations. It’s retaining monitor of the place you drive to and is ready to anticipate what you may need to do. Would you want me to drive you to the grocery, since it’s Tuesday afternoon and also you often appear to buy groceries on that day and time?

In the meantime, one other auto maker or tech agency is promoting an AI self-driving automotive, nevertheless it doesn’t have the identical nifty superior NLP capabilities. It merely finds out the place you need to go. It doesn’t notably work together with you. It doesn’t hold monitor of the place you’ve been going to. Please understand that it’s nonetheless in all key respects a Degree 5 AI self-driving automotive. There isn’t any said requirement that it should have the superior NLP that my AI self-driving automotive has.

Should you have been going to purchase a Degree 5 AI self-driving automotive, which might you purchase – the one I’m promoting that has the superior NLP or the one provided by one other auto maker or tech agency that doesn’t have the superior NLP?

I’d dare say that you’re making your choice based mostly on a differentiation among the many Degree 5 AI self-driving automobiles capabilities. If that’s the case, you’re shopping for a non-commodity.

For my article about NLP and AI self-driving automobiles, see:

For extra particulars concerning the ranges of AI self-driving automobiles, see my article:

For the socio-behavioral elements of AI self-driving automobiles, see my article:

For explanation-based AI and self-driving automobiles, see my article:

In different phrases, there are going to be tons and plenty of AI options concerned in AI self-driving automobiles which might be past these wanted to realize the baseline of a real Degree 5 AI self-driving automotive. The auto makers and tech companies will readily be including into their Degree 5 AI self-driving automobiles quite a lot of such options, doing so to purposely differentiate their product from others within the market.

In case you need to attempt to argue that the NLP instance is perhaps “inconsequential” as a differentiating function, I’ll be pleased to take you on about that. I feel it’s almost self-evident that we see at this time how a lot individuals like Alexa and Siri and that it’s a differentiating function when it comes to units that may speak versus not speak. Moreover, people who use Alexa and Siri can readily point out to you that one in every of them is superior when it comes to NLP over the opposite.

I’d say that if all else is equal about two Degree 5 AI self-driving automobiles aside from one has the superior NLP and one doesn’t, there can be consumers that might worth the superior NLP. In that sense, I don’t assume you can also make the case for the NLP being inconsequential. I’d say it’s at the very least consequential, and can trigger some consumers to distinguish between these Degree 5 AI self-driving automobiles which have it or shouldn’t have it. I’m not saying that each one consumers will assume it consequential, and certainly there are sure to be some consumers that don’t care about whether or not there’s a complicated NLP or not.

In case you are now leaning towards agreeing that perhaps the superior NLP could be a differentiator, however maybe you at the moment are eager to argue that it is only one issue and I’m hanging onto a skinny thread, properly, in that case, let’s talk about different such differing capabilities.

Suppose we now have one Degree 5 AI self-driving automotive that has AI options that present a clean journey. When the street floor is detected as tough, the AI is ready to maneuver the self-driving automotive in a fashion that gives a much less bumpy experience than you may in any other case have gotten. This includes the AI detecting that a tough street exists, it includes doing AI motion planning to go slowly and steer the automotive round potholes and tough patches. And so forth.

In case you have been confronted with shopping for one AI self-driving automotive of a Degree 5 versus one other, and also you have been knowledgeable that one had the AI-enabled clean journey function and the opposite didn’t, would this make a distinction? Perhaps you don’t care about having a clean journey and so that you may say it isn’t necessary to you. I’d guess although that a number of different individuals would relish the added AI function that gives a smoother experience. This might be a differentiator.

One of many Degree 5 AI self-driving automobiles presents 5G connectivity, one other one doesn’t. Using 5G makes the time wanted to do an OTA (Over-the-Air) reference to the cloud of the auto maker or tech agency a lot quicker, permitting you to readily obtain the newest patches and updates into your AI self-driving automotive. Different auto makers and tech companies aren’t together with 5G. Which might you need, the quicker connecting self-driving automotive or the slower transmitting one? Once more, a differentiator.

I can go on almost endlessly with such capabilities.

For extra about OTA, see my article:

For my article about 5G, see:

For my article about edge issues of AI self-driving automobiles, see:

For various sorts of AI self-driving automotive driving types, see my article:

A number of the options can be instantly associated to the driving activity, comparable to the graceful experience AI-enabled function. A number of the options might be not directly associated to the driving activity, such because the 5G connectivity. You may argue that the superior NLP is just not strictly talking associated to the driving process per se, although it does should do with the general utility of the AI self-driving automotive. Anyway, I’m definitely prepared to say that there are some AI-related options that maybe have little to do with the driving process and but will nonetheless present a differentiating facet of a Degree 5 AI self-driving automotive from one other one.

This then addresses the monolith fable.

In recap, it won’t be the case that each one true Degree 5 AI self-driving automobiles would be the similar. They may differ on options which might be concerned within the driving process, and different options which are associated to the driving activity however indirectly so, and even different options which are tangentially associated to the driving process however nonetheless probably valued by consumers of AI self-driving automobiles.

That’s a non-commodity.

Spontaneous Options Fable

Thus far, I’ve tried to make the case for the facet that even as soon as we attain the vaunted Degree 5 AI self-driving automobiles, they are going to be differentiable by their options, and thus it isn’t the case that each one AI self-driving automobiles are the identical and indifferentiable.

Once I get to that time in my dialogue, I typically may have somebody cease me and supply the thought that Okay, it may be the case that there shall be some variations initially, however ultimately issues will flatten out and all AI self-driving automobiles would be the similar.

That is the spontaneous options fable.

Let’s get again to my toaster conundrum. The primary electrical bread toaster is credited with being invented by Alan MacMasters in 1893. You’ll be able to look it up.

Suppose we return in time to the 1890’s and early 1900s. Toasters are beginning to be bought. They initially had a troublesome time making an attempt to good the heating parts. This meant that your toast may get overheated or burnt. In 1905, Albert Marsh got here up with a brand new sort of heating factor that was higher than what existed for toasters on the time. Much less probabilities of burning your toast!

Some toasters included Marsh’s model of the heating aspect, different toasters didn’t. Was the higher heating factor by Marsh a differentiator between numerous toasters? Sure, undoubtedly.

In 1921, Charles Strite invented a pop-up mechanism that might mechanically get your toast to be pushed up and it was simpler so that you can get your toasted bread. Was this a differentiator between numerous toasters? Sure, undoubtedly.

Why am I telling you about these toaster developments? As a result of this went on and on. Beginning in 1893, we have now had enhancements in toasters through the years. It’s a continuous cat-and-mouse recreation. Some new function is invented, and a few toasters have it and a few don’t.  At any given time limit, there shall be options that some toasters have, and others don’t. It’s in fact possible that over time some options will creep into the core elements, corresponding to the automated pop-up contraption. In the meantime, one thing else new will probably be invented.

This has been happening with toasters since 1893 — that’s almost 100 and thirty years lengthy!

When it comes to true Degree 5 AI self-driving automobiles, do you actually assume that it’ll come a day once they all have the identical actual options? Actually?

If toasters have stored altering over the 100+ years, do you assume it makes any sense to recommend that AI self-driving automobiles, which might be one of the superior types of know-how ever made by mankind, they’ll merely all end-up with the identical options?

I don’t see how any affordable individual might consider that the auto makers and tech companies won’t be regularly battling over arising with new AI options for self-driving automobiles.

Right here’s one thing for you for instance. I’ve talked about in my writing and in my speeches concerning the risks of people with the ability to probably prank AI self-driving automobiles. This consists of tricking an AI self-driving automotive into doing one thing as a result of you understand how the AI self-driving automotive will react. For instance, if an AI self-driving automotive is setup to return to a cease the second that it detects a pedestrian moving into the road, you’ll be able to just about guess that some pedestrians will purposely step into the road since they know the AI will pressure the self-driving automotive to return to a halt.

At the moment, we as people should gauge whether or not one other human goes to allow us to step off the curb. It’s the pedestrian eyeballing the human driver. There are dangers concerned on this harmful recreation. Perhaps the human driver will cease, perhaps not. Sooner or later, with AI self-driving automobiles, the human pedestrian will have the ability to probably trick the AI into halting, just by the human making a movement as if they’re going to step into the road, whether or not they are surely meaning to go throughout the road or not. Perhaps they actually do need to go throughout the road, or perhaps that simply discover pleasure in tricking the AI into stopping the self-driving automotive.

For my article concerning the pranking of AI self-driving automobiles, see:

For the burnout of AI builders, see my article:

For the idealism that some have about AI self-driving automobiles, see my article:

For the selfish views of some AI builders, see my article:

A real Degree 5 AI self-driving automotive doesn’t have any said necessities about coping with pranking. Certainly, I’d say that the majority AI builders and auto makers and tech companies aren’t even contemplating what to do about pranking. They’re so emmeshed in simply attending to a Degree 5 AI self-driving automotive that the pranking matter just isn’t on their radar.

I point out the pranking as a result of we’ve been engaged on an anti-pranking answer. This can be a function that I predict will finally be of worth to AI self-driving automobiles. Proper now, nobody actually cares about it. As soon as we’ve precise AI self-driving automobiles on our roads, and as soon as individuals work out methods to prank these AI self-driving automobiles, I’d guess that there shall be an uproar about what to do about it.

My level is that this can be a function that in all probability gained’t enter into the mosaic of AI self-driving automobiles options for a really very long time. When it begins to get launched, I’d predict that it’ll start with some easy sorts of anti-pranking capabilities. Over time, they may grow to be extra strong.

The hot button is that it gained’t be as if all AI self-driving automobiles all of a sudden are outfitted with an anti-pranking function. Moreover, people who have such a function may need a easy model, whereas different AI self-driving automobiles have a extra complicated one.

I do know some which have stated that with OTA, all AI self-driving automobiles can spontaneously all have the identical options.

Magically, somebody is someway going to get all the differing auto makers and tech companies to comply with a sure sort of function, and get all of them to undertake it into their very own proprietary AI techniques of their self-driving automobiles, after which get them to all have it downloaded into their fleet of AI self-driving automobiles, doing so for all AI self-driving automobiles of all manufacturers and makes and fashions, throughout the globe.


How did we go from a market of companies which might be fiercely competing with every and every is eager to differentiate their product from everybody else’s, and now they’re out of the blue all cooperating and absolutely agreeing to have the identical actual options and to implement these options in the identical actual means on the identical day and time?

I can solely think about this occurring if someway the federal government stepped into the AI self-driving automotive market in a very heavy-handed approach and by some means mandated this type of all-features, all-the-same, for everybody on the similar time, type of strategy. Doesn’t appear very sensible to me. This may be an extremely altering drive to our financial system and to a somewhat large business. Appears unlikely.

For elements about federal laws and AI self-driving automobiles, see my article:

For state and native municipality associated laws, see my article:

For product legal responsibility features of AI self-driving automobiles, see my article:

For the crossing of the Rubicon about AI self-driving automobiles, see my article:

For extra concerning the coopetition amongst AI self-driving automotive makers, see my article:

Homogeneous Automobiles Fable

I consider that I’ve now usually refuted the notion of AI self-driving automobiles probably turning into a commodity, which I’ve tried to make the case they’re a non-commodity by mentioning that they won’t magically converge onto the identical set of AI options and that as an alternative there shall be an ongoing and at occasions bruising type of competitors to repeatedly come out with new options.

Let’s suppose that one way or the other the AI options all do converge within the sense that each one AI self-driving automobiles have precisely the identical AI options and achieve this on the similar time limits. That is completely unimaginable in any affordable stretch of the creativeness.

However, suppose as a thought experiment we entertain this relatively farfetched notion and achieve this to see if we will help the commodity believers.

Would we not differentiate the AI self-driving automobiles on different elements past the AI options?

At present, the automotive business markets us their automobiles based mostly on the colour of the automotive, the form of the automotive, the general look of the automotive, and so forth. Why do individuals purchase one sort of automotive over one other?

Lots of at present’s automobiles have just about the identical driving capabilities.

You’d be exhausting pressed when evaluating some fashions of automobiles to make the case that the rationale a purchaser buys one versus the opposite is because of the driving capabilities. As an alternative, it’s extra like the texture of the seats, the inside upholstery, the cup holders, and different non-driving associated options.

Certainly, the automotive business spends hundreds of thousands upon hundreds of thousands of dollars to review the psyche of automotive consumers after which tries to design the form and look of their automobiles to draw these consumers. There’s almost as a lot effort put into the precise driving mechanisms as there’s within the look-and-feel of the automotive.

I might assert that an AI self-driving automotive continues to be a automotive. By this, I imply that folks will nonetheless purchase a automotive based mostly what a automotive seems like and what the inside is like, and so forth. Put aside the precise driving capabilities and focus for a second on all the non-driving elements.

Some commodity believers appear to assume that we’re going to end-up with homogenous automobiles.

On this principle, all automobiles, and let’s say that we end-up finally with all and solely AI self-driving automobiles, would be the similar look, the identical form, have the identical interiors, and so on.


For those who take a look at the futuristic designs by most of the auto makers, you’ll be able to readily see they’re diverging already when it comes to what the dimensions of their future automobiles may be and what the interiors could be like. Why would the auto makers determine to merely copycat one another when it comes to the look-and-feel of their automobiles? It doesn’t appear to carry water. It’s with none affordable logic.

I do know that there are sketches made by some futurists and animators that attempt to painting a world through which all of us are driving in the identical equivalent wanting AI self-driving automobiles. I feel this is identical as the concept we’ll all gown alike sooner or later. We’ll all put on the identical bounce go well with, universally obtainable, which simplifies life. It additionally wipes out the style business.

Once I see such homogenous futuristic how-we-will-live predictions, it jogs my memory of the Dr. Seuss story that I used to learn to my youngsters once they have been younger, telling the story of the Sneetches. Have you learnt the celebs upon thars story? Please check out it. The purpose of my bringing it up is that even when all of us have been issued the identical wanting bounce fits in some sort of unusual Massive Brother type of future, I might guess that some individuals would need to add one thing to their leap go well with to make it look totally different. It’s human nature, I declare.

Are we going to end-up with AI self-driving automobiles which have the identical equivalent look-and-feel, and for which from the surface they appear precisely the identical, and whereas inside they’re precisely the identical when it comes to the format and inside functionality?

Hardly probably. I’d say straight out no.

There shall be quite a lot of differing interiors. I’ve predicted, and others have too that we’ll have swivel seats inside these AI self-driving automobiles and have the ability to swivel round and face our fellow passengers. Some may need seats that may develop into beds, permitting individuals to sleep whereas of their AI self-driving automotive. There can be a wealthy number of methods during which the interiors will probably be designed and offered.

I’d argue that very same is true concerning the exteriors of AI self-driving automobiles.

I do know that some commodity believers would say that folks gained’t care concerning the exteriors, since they’ll solely take into consideration that the self-driving automotive is meant to get them from level A to level B. They presumably gained’t care what the outside seems like. I’m not so satisfied that we’re going to surrender our imagery of the standing of various sorts of automobiles, even in a world that turns into saturated with AI self-driving automobiles.

In any case, I doubt that you would be able to fairly make the identical case concerning the interiors. Definitely, most would agree that the inside will turn into essential, maybe much more so than with in the present day’s automobiles. If you’ll be driving in self-driving automobiles, maybe doing so much more than you experience in typical automobiles in the present day, I’d guess that you’d care fairly a bit concerning the inside of the self-driving automotive. In our shift and transformation to a cellular financial system, whereby we’ll readily have obtainable AI self-driving automobiles on a continuous 24×7 foundation, we’d get finicky concerning the interiors.

If you’ll counter-argue that each one interiors will end-up the identical, I don’t purchase into that suggestion. In a way, if that have been true, wouldn’t all interiors at this time be the identical? They don’t seem to be. Individuals like totally different sorts of interiors and there’s no one universally accepted only-way to rearrange the inside of a automotive. The identical can be true with the arrival of AI self-driving automobiles.

As per my earlier factors concerning the AI options, the inside options of AI self-driving automobiles will come and go, some options showing and being clamored for by consumers, whereas different inside design options will are likely to die out. Some inside options can be thought-about core, whereas different options can be discretionary. There can be an ongoing battle waged by the auto makers and tech companies concerning the nature of the interiors of their automobiles. Stars upon thars will rule.

The important thing takeaway is that we should not solely think about the AI options as distinguishable, I’d assert that the interiors might be distinguishable, and maybe the exteriors too (although I’m prepared to concede a tad on that facet, however not a lot!).

Recall that we earlier outlined that a commodity is a product that’s fungible and there’s nothing that permits the customer from distinguishing one such product providing from one other. I declare that for true Degree 5 AI self-driving automobiles, the AI options can be distinguishable, and moreover the inside, and probably too the outside.

You’ll readily be capable of distinguish one AI self-driving automotive from one other. Deciding which one to purchase will contain consideration of these elements.

Driving in a single will even be considerably a selection made concerning the elements, as a result of I’d anticipate that folks will need to journey in an AI self-driving automotive that most accurately fits their wants.

I’d really feel safer being within the AI self-driving automotive that has the anti-prank options, so I purposely specify this once I request a ridesharing service to offer me with an AI self-driving automotive to get me to work. Or, perhaps I just like the AI self-driving automotive that has the all-bed inside and I need to use it to get me to my family members throughout the nation, however when I’m in downtown I would like the AI self-driving automotive that has the seats that permit me to get my work achieved.

That’s a full suite of things, subsequently a real AI self-driving automotive can be a non-commodity.

For the advertising of AI self-driving automobiles, see my article:

For household journeys in AI self-driving automobiles, see my article:

For the way forward for ridesharing, see my article:

For the continuous 24×7 of AI self-driving automobiles, see my article:

No-Providers Wanted Fable

Let’s subsequent contemplate a twist that some don’t contemplate about the way forward for AI self-driving automobiles, the providers aspect. I’d wish to share with you the “no-services wanted” fable that some have about AI self-driving automobiles.

To date, I’ve targeted solely on the product aspect of AI self-driving automobiles on this dialogue. It’s certainly a product, identical to a toaster. In case you are shopping for a toaster, you primarily look solely on the product options. You’re much less probably to consider the providers points associated to the toaster. Toaster are cheap, and you may discard it if the factor breaks. Additionally, you are likely to assume a toaster goes to final a very long time earlier than it breaks or falters.

For an AI self-driving automotive, I’d recommend that there might be a providers component that may additional probably differentiate one AI self-driving automotive from one other. In some ways, the providers and the product tie collectively. A automotive is in contrast to a toaster. Automobiles are comparatively costly compared to a toaster. There’s much more “shifting elements” for a automotive and much more probability of issues going awry with a automotive.

If you purchase a automotive at present, you realize that inevitably you will have to do upkeep on that automotive. It will occur. You may assume forward and say to your self, ought to I purchase a automotive from auto maker X if they’re recognized for doing a awful job of service? Perhaps you’d have second ideas about shopping for that automotive. Maybe another auto maker offers a automotive of an analogous nature, however they’re recognized for his or her unimaginable service.

I proceed to need to remind a few of the pundits about AI self-driving automobiles that a self-driving automotive continues to be a automotive. There are pundits that appear to reside in an ideal world by which you get an AI self-driving automotive and it by no means breaks down. The automotive elements by no means put on out. How would this magically occur?

Let’s be trustworthy about automobiles. They’ve all types of issues. Typically they’re a lemon from day one. Typically they’ve points as a result of put on and tear. Realistically, there’s upkeep wanted on automobiles. There shall be upkeep wanted on AI self-driving automobiles. There shall be recollects of AI self-driving automobiles. And so on. I do know that is surprising to those who consider in a future by which automobiles by no means breakdown and by no means have any issues. It flies within the face of actuality.

For extra about recollects of AI self-driving automobiles, see my article:

For what occurs in accidents involving AI self-driving automobiles, see my article:

For towing of AI self-driving automobiles, see my article:

For the notion of perhaps beginning over with AI self-driving automobiles, see my article:

Suppose that I determine to start out my very own ridesharing service. I strategy a number of auto makers which have their very own manufacturers of AI self-driving automobiles. Let’s fake the AI self-driving automobiles are all about the identical (although I’ve talked about repeatedly herein that I don’t consider that would be the case).

A type of auto makers has an excellent upkeep program that takes care of the AI self-driving automotive bumper-to-bumper and they’re well-known for holding their AI self-driving automobiles in prime form. I’ll name it the Ace Auto firm. There’s one other auto maker, the Zany Auto firm, recognized for doing a awful job of sustaining their AI self-driving automobiles. Their AI self-driving automobiles are sometimes within the auto store getting fastened up.

I’d say to myself, nicely, each of their AI self-driving automobiles are about the identical, from a product perspective, however considered one of them presents a a lot better service when it comes to sustaining the AI self-driving automotive. I need to hold my ridesharing fleet of AI self-driving automobiles going as continuous as potential, since I solely become profitable when these AI self-driving automobiles are giving paying passengers a journey. I’ll go together with the Ace Auto firm.

Aha! I simply decided based mostly on a differentiation associated to the providers aspect of AI self-driving automobiles.

We now have two methods to distinguish true Degree 5 AI self-driving automobiles, one that’s based mostly on the AI self-driving automotive as a product, and the opposite based mostly on the AI self-driving automotive and its related providers points.

I consider this additional bolsters the non-commodity assertion, specifically, an AI self-driving automotive shouldn’t be a commodity.


We’ve walked via the explanation why I’m claiming that it appears unlikely that AI self-driving automobiles will grow to be a commodity.  There are these rumors on the market about AI self-driving automobiles turning into commodities and I respect that these having such a perception may properly have their very own foundation or logic for making such an assertion.

I feel that lots of these commodity believers are unaware of the myths elements that I’ve tried to delineate herein, that are:

  •         Monolith fantasy
  •         Spontaneous Options fable
  •         Homogeneous Automobiles fantasy
  •         No-Providers Wanted fable

Is there any purpose to fret about whether or not the way forward for AI self-driving automobiles may certainly be one among turning into a commodity?

You is perhaps tempted to marvel if that is all a tempest in a teapot. Perhaps it actually doesn’t matter if someday sooner or later we see that AI self-driving automobiles have turn into a commodity.

I consider it does matter.

If these commodity believers are to be believed at present, it could actually dampen the prevailing effort towards advancing AI and its use for AI self-driving automobiles. There is perhaps enterprising AI builders that turn out to be disillusioned in the event that they assume that each one AI self-driving automobiles are going to merely converge onto the identical set of options and be a blur of the identical repeated issues.

Why struggle exhausting now to be progressive if the top result’s going to be that nothing appears any totally different from the opposite?

I’ve stated many occasions that AI helps to encourage and advance progress on self-driving automobiles, and likewise that self-driving automobiles are serving to to encourage and push ahead on AI applied sciences and methods. There is a vital synergy between the advances in AI and the advances associated to self-driving automobiles. The CEO of Apple had likened the trouble to supply a real Degree 5 AI self-driving automotive as a moonshot, which I agree together with his sentiment. Recall that once we have been making an attempt to get to the moon, it additionally pushed ahead advances in know-how that I doubt we’d have as we speak or that it might have taken many extra years to succeed in fruition of these applied sciences (if ever found in any respect).

For the moonshot features of AI self-driving automobiles, see my article:

For the Turing check because it pertains to AI self-driving automobiles, see my article:

For the potential of the so-called singularity, see my article:

For start-ups within the AI self-driving automotive business, see my article:

The push towards AI self-driving automobiles is offering that very same type of impetus.

By spreading the phrase that AI self-driving automobiles will finally be a commodity, it might regrettably (IMHO) very properly trigger some auto makers or tech companies to determine it isn’t well worth the assets and a spotlight they’ve been placing towards it. In the long run, if AI self-driving automobiles are totally indistinguishable, presumably the one factor that may matter is worth. That’s not a lot of a motivator for anybody concerned on this journey.

I earnestly don’t see any affordable path of getting AI self-driving automobiles turning into the identical as say sugar or wheat. Since I earlier opted to cite Karl Marx, let’s finish this dialogue on his quote that capitalism “brings forth dwelling offspring, or, in any case, lays golden eggs.”

Succinctly said, AI self-driving automobiles can be non-commodity of golden eggs.

Copyright 2018 Dr. Lance Eliot

This content material is initially posted on AI Tendencies.


About the author