Tech Videos

Comcast: Digital Transformation and Innovation

AIG: Data Science in the Insurance Industry

Sponsored by:
How are cable suppliers evolving to compete with cord-cutting, streaming providers and new media? Chris Satchell, Government Vice President and Chief Product Officer at Comcast Cable, speaks with CXOTalk and visitor co-host Brian Solis about digital transformation within the cable TV business.

Satchell leads Comcast’s product, design and innovation groups in Philadelphia, Denver and Silicon Valley to develop and design the corporate’s shopper merchandise utilized by hundreds of thousands every day. He beforehand served as Shopper Know-how Officer at Nike, and EVP of analysis and improvement at IGT (Worldwide Recreation Know-how), the world chief in gaming leisure and on line casino methods.

Michael Krigsman: Welcome to Episode 267 of CxOTalk! What a tremendous present we have now right now! Do you know that Comcast, the cable supplier, is among the largest media corporations on the planet? Their revenues final yr have been like $80 billion. And so, immediately we’re talking with Chris Satchell, who’s Comcast’s Government Vice President and Chief Product Officer. However, not solely that, we’re additionally speaking with one of many prime digital transformation targeted business analysts on the planet, Brian Solis.

I’m Michael Krigsman. I’m an business analyst and the host of CxOTalk. I need to say a fast thanks to Livestream as a result of Livestream offers our video infrastructure. These guys supported CxOTalk from the beginning. When you go to, they provides you with a reduction on their plans.

I all the time overlook this. We’ve a tweet chat happening at this very minute. Go to Twitter with the hashtag #CxOTalk. Should you’re on Fb, go to Twitter additionally as a result of that’s the place the dialog [is]. You’ll be able to ask Chris and Brian questions, they usually’ll reply.

With out additional ado, Chris Satchell, how are you? Welcome to CxOTalk, and thanks a lot for being right here.

Chris Satchell: Thanks for inviting me, Michael. It’s nice to be right here. It’s nice to have Brian right here as nicely. I’m wanting ahead to this dialog.

Michael Krigsman: Chris, very briefly inform us about Comcast and inform us what [is] your position. You’re a chief product officer. What does that really imply? What do you do there?

Chris Satchell: Nicely … (indiscernible, 00:02:03) Comcast…. I imply it’s a very giant U.S. firm, $80 billion in income in 2016, rising properly this yr. It’s fairly a posh firm as a result of, on the cable aspect, we’ve the world’s largest IP community. We’re virtually in 30 million households with merchandise from high-speed knowledge and sensible clever wi-fi to branded house safety and life preservation providers to sensible cameras. Then we’ve got voice providers and, in fact, video. We do an enormous quantity of video providers. We even have a really giant and rising business-to-business aspect of what we do. Not as huge as residential, however it’s an enormous enterprise in its personal proper. Then, in fact, we now have the opposite half of the corporate with NBC Common, which is unimaginable within the realm of content material manufacturing, whether or not it’s for community tv, for cable, for movies, or theme parks, and so a really broad media firm.

My position is slightly unusual. It says chief product officer, however I come historically to corporations as a chief know-how officer. I’m simply very type of creative-focused in that, and so what my groups do is we design; we construct; we function all the consumer-facing services for Comcast. That’s every little thing from hardware, from the kind of SoC design on up, industrial design, firmware, to providers like X1, which is our modern video service. We do the back-end cloud providers for that in addition to the shoppers throughout any platform.

We’re a totally built-in design, product administration, and engineering group that spans about 2,000 individuals. That’s simply my space that does shopper merchandise. We’re a a lot bigger engineering and know-how group. It’s one thing individuals don’t actually understand about us. We’re a hardcore know-how product improvement firm very ahead leaning, and hopefully, we’ll get to speak about a few of these issues right now.

Michael Krigsman: Implausible. You’re a really wealthy, numerous firm with a variety of totally different merchandise. I’m a really completely happy Comcast buyer. In terms of Web, I do that; I stream this video present referred to as CxOTalk. I’ve your gigabit service, and the know-how is nice. It really works rather well.

Chris Satchell: That’s good to listen to.

Michael Krigsman: Yeah, nicely, hey. Hey, I’m a grateful buyer. Our cohost, the opposite visitor, and in addition my visitor co-host, an previous buddy who has been on CxOTalk earlier than is Brian Solis. Brian, you’re one of many prime individuals on the market researching digital transformation. Welcome. What are you engaged on lately?

Brian Solis: Nicely, it’s an absolute pleasure to be again. Additionally, Chris and I are old-time pals and in addition previous associates, I assume, if you wish to get technical about it.

Chris Satchell: [Laughter]

Brian Solis: We share a love for very many issues outdoors of innovation and work, so it’s actually enjoyable to be right here. What I’m engaged on, there are three issues that I’m targeted on. One is digital transformation. The opposite is innovation, company innovation as a result of they go hand-in-hand. Truly, 4 issues. The third is this concept of buyer and worker expertise as a result of it provides the primary two, innovation and digital transformation, function. Then lastly, should you put a Venn diagram proper there on the middle, is company tradition. That’s actually both a catalyst or the best inhibitor of all the above. I’m actually making an attempt to get not simply to the know-how aspect of all of this stuff, however the human aspect of it.

I simply revealed a report this week, truly, referred to as The Change Agent’s Manifesto, which was written for people like Chris to assist them principally change mindsets and views of the C-suite and boards to assist them perceive that each one of this stuff aren’t value facilities in that we have now to look broader than quarter-to-quarter efficiency. We’ve got to search for the long-term to compete for the longer term. That’s my focus. It’s principally nothing a lot.

Michael Krigsman: [Laughter]

Brian Solis: [Laughter]

Michael Krigsman: Okay, so change and transformation. Comcast has been in enterprise, Chris, for nearly 55 years, roughly?

Chris Satchell: Yeah.

Michael Krigsman: I’ve to think about that, in the middle of these 55 years, Comcast has gone by way of numerous forms of modifications. You’re a know-how enterprise, so how do you consider what Brian was simply saying: transformation, the cultural dimensions, and alter? How do you handle that? How do you consider that?

Chris Satchell: Properly, the very first thing I’ll say is I feel we did much less steady supply 50 years in the past than we do now. That appears probably somewhat bit earlier than my time, however I absolutely agree with Brian. Brian and I, one of many causes that we turned pals is we see eye-to-eye on so many issues concerning the shopper journey and the way you need to allow that. I absolutely agree.

Tradition and individuals are the keys of any know-how transformation, I imply any transformation, however particularly know-how transformations. One of many issues I all the time take into consideration, and I speak to individuals about this, is in my entire profession I’ve solely truly ever seen two tasks go off the rails due to sheer know-how, and your know-how is simply too arduous to beat. I imply it’s simply limitations at that time in historical past the place you simply couldn’t get previous it.

Each different concern has been about individuals, and so, for me, know-how is inherently a individuals challenge. That’s how we strategy it. You need to get the tradition proper. It’s a must to get the context proper. You need to get the staff proper. You need to get path proper. Then you possibly can drive change and speed up it.

It’s a must to get the correct platform. As we speak about enabling change, enabling innovation, it’s positive to have nice intentions. However, all of your platforms, methods, the connectivity between them, and the instruments you need to get concepts into these platforms, in the event that they aren’t in place and in the event that they aren’t designed round velocity, you’re not going to be as quick as it’s worthwhile to be on this world. Though you need to have the whole lot else, what I say about it’s that an incredible workforce will overcome something. When you can take a fantastic staff, give them the context together with the instruments to do nice work, they may speed up, and they’ll outstrip something you thought they could have the ability to do.

Michael Krigsman: Brian, I do know you will have feedback on this.

Brian Solis: [Laughter]

Michael Krigsman: [Laughter] We’re all so well mannered ready for one another.


Michael Krigsman: Hey, this isn’t a household present, so don’t be so well mannered. Simply leap in and interrupt me.

Chris Satchell: Keep in mind, I’m English. I had years of conditioning with brainwashing, as my mother would name it. In England, you need to wait till any person stops speaking to start out speaking. I’ve had 18 years in America making an attempt to unlearn that, Michael.

Brian Solis: [Laughter] Oh, alright. Properly, I need to ask a query. Properly, not ask a query, however there’s part of Chris’s story that I might like to be shared with everybody. I wrote a guide a few years in the past referred to as X: The Expertise When Enterprise Meets Design. It was actually about tips on how to assume in a different way about innovation by taking a step again and excited about design for a brand new era of consumers and staff that basically usually are not in alignment with at this time’s company insurance policies, processes, and even simply how we expect and the way we take into consideration productization. Once I first met Chris, he was a current transplant from Nike to Comcast. We shared an instantaneous ardour for design, and I needed Chris to type of inform us a bit about his background from Nike to Comcast and what he delivered to the corporate that was distinctive.

Chris Satchell: Nicely, as you stated, we hit it off. A part of the reason being it’s about design, and it’s about designing the whole journey. I feel that’s one thing that there’s a few issues we actually targeted on at Nike.

One was this concept of shopper model enterprise. Do what’s proper for the client first; then fear concerning the model and the model promise you make to the client; then fear concerning the enterprise. When you get the primary two proper, the third will come.

The second was about fascinated with your complete journey. Each contact level on that journey is an interplay with the client. That may be constructive or unfavourable, so you can be constructing promoters all the best way alongside or detractors all the best way alongside.

You must assume very broadly, and so that you assume means past once you’ve received a product put in otherwise you’ve acquired it in your house. You must assume, how did I study it? How did I purchase it? How did I pay for it? How did it get to me? How did I set up it?

At Nike, we might assume all the best way to, “What’s my interplay with an in-store athlete that was serving me?” as a result of that may be a nice connection level with the corporate. Each level alongside a journey is your model. You need to be genuine, and you must serve the client appropriately there. That’s a few of the issues we introduced right here.

Then from my time at Xbox, once more it’s rather a lot about delivering the easiest expertise, not settling, and by no means being content material with what you’re offering, regardless of how good it’s, since you sort of should assume on this shopper world about how good you assume your expertise is. There’s anyone on the market merrily elevating the bar on you. It gained’t should be in your sector. It doesn’t need to be in your business.

I feel, so far as shoppers are involved, it’s wherever they see the most effective expertise, they now anticipate you to match it. Whether or not that may make enterprise sense for you or not, that’s simply what shoppers assume now. And so, that relentless drive ahead to only be the easiest–not sector, not enterprise, not business, however simply the perfect–is one thing that I introduced right here, however different individuals have introduced it right here as properly.

My directs, they’re superb individuals. All of them assume, and people leaders assume the identical factor. And so, we’re all the time making an attempt to push one another to consider how we ship a greater product to a shopper.

Brian Solis: Michael, if I might simply ask yet one more query on that entrance as a result of that’s an incredible practice of thought in that your work in the present day, and your previous work, is admittedly the way forward for what I feel most organizations appear to consider since you hit on one thing that I feel loads of executives miss, and that’s the shopper doesn’t care about all the politics and BS that occur inside the group. They only need the expertise to be personalised. They need it to be nice. They need it to be intuitive, perhaps clear in some ways. However, the factor that I actually hope the individuals can study from you and different organizations which might be breaking new floor is that innovation is as a lot about merchandise as it’s about insurance policies, processes, and the way we even work as properly. I feel the most important factor is simply shifting mindsets.

I take a look at at this time’s–I name them–Era C. They’re not millennials. They’re not Centennials.  They’re not Era X. They’re simply anyone who lives a digital way of life. What all of them share is that this heightened bar for expectations and these new behaviors. They’re impatient and all of this stuff that, for instance, we speak concerning the uberization or the consumerization of know-how. When somebody makes use of Uber, that turns into their commonplace for engagement. When somebody makes use of an Apple product, that’s their normal – or Google Search.

This new degree of expertise is blurring the road no matter services or products that they need that very same type of instinct, that very same kind of readability and cleanliness all through your complete journey. But, organizations are constructed on these 50-, 60-year-old buildings which have all of these issues aside. How, in your work, have you ever been capable of go cross-functionally to deliver these individuals collectively and see the sunshine?

Chris Satchell: Yeah, it’s such a great level, Brian, as a result of one option to say it’s if I’m a buyer, I feel my response is, “Your org construction just isn’t my drawback.” We used to even speak about this again at Xbox about making an attempt to paper over the cracks in our org construction in order that the buyer didn’t see. You’ll see so many corporations whenever you monitor that product portfolio, it matches the org construction, and also you’ve received to battle so onerous to take that mentality out, and also you’ve acquired to seek out leaders who shall be selfless and say, “Okay. Sure, I’ve this launch car, however I’m going to take performance from some place else. I’m going to surrender one thing in my launch car as a result of it doesn’t make sense to the client.”

One factor we do is we come customer-in. Everyone says that, however we actually take into consideration what would the client need to do, and that noticed us take away a variety of apps from the app retailer. We actually shrunk down our video apps. We’ve actually consolidated.

It’s additionally having an ideal understanding. We’ve got a really robust consumer analysis perform right here. You’ve simply acquired to be open to it as a result of one of many issues I discovered is individuals say, “We’d like analysis.” You then present them analysis they usually’re like, “I don’t agree with the analysis, so we’re going to hold on what we have been doing.” Why did I do all that analysis?

What we attempt to do is, as a lot as we will, be actually kind of selfless about it and say, “Nicely, hey. What did the client simply inform us?”  Even when it’s not what we needed to listen to, even when it’s a special course than our sensible strategic minds got here up with, that is what they stated, so let’s go comply with that. If you come customer-in, you begin making totally different selections. Then what you need to do is battle, battle, battle internally to cross organizations to just remember to ship the best way the client needs.

One factor that I discover actually useful is constructing that mixed imaginative and prescient technique and continuously updating it to say, “That is what our portfolio means for the buyer. Right here’s what we’re doing for them,” and resist speaking about launch automobiles in that and say, “Listed here are shopper issues we’re going to unravel. Listed here are alternatives to please them,” after which fill in how your portfolio ought to do this and also you begin to get a unique reply.

You say, “Properly, we’ve all the time accomplished this on this launch car right here, this app, this product, this piece of hardware.” That doesn’t make any sense anymore. On this world we’re defining, it ought to be elsewhere. Then you definitely simply need to cope with the politics of that. It’s a continuing strain as a result of individuals will regress into their SAP reporting buildings.

It simply takes a number of political capital from all of the leaders to maintain doing the best factor for the client. For those who do it sufficient, it turns into discovered conduct, which is nice. Now you begin speaking. One of many issues that may assist, as I give it some thought, is getting that widespread language.

I’ll offer you a really robust instance. We’ve superb high-speed knowledge providers, and we’ve got nice house safety providers. However actually, what the buyer thinks about is their digital house. They don’t actually care what the merchandise are or the org construction.

I’ve a digital residence. I need to have automation in it. I need to have nice, ubiquitous wi-fi. I would like it to have the ability to react to me. I need to have peace of thoughts round my residence.

None of that claims you must have a specific product construction, and so we modified the identify. We stated, “Look. We’re now Digital Residence. We’re going to combine the groups. We’re going to consider it in another way than simply the vertical companies we considered earlier than.” All this takes strain.

The very last thing I’ll add in is, as a result of I feel it speaks to the journey, we did a product we launched in Might this yr referred to as xFi, and it’s like a sensible, clever, entire house wi-fi. One of many issues I really like, and I exploit this for instance internally about what the staff did, they spent as a lot time creating all the on-boarding from on-boarding the gateway, establishing your community. That took as a lot improvement effort, as a lot design effort, as a lot product effort as all the remainder of the expertise mixed, all of the totally different features, all of the various things it might do.

The thought is you don’t get to try this typically. You might do it as soon as each few years. You could do it a few occasions a yr should you’re shifting. The secret’s we needed that second of fact to be superb, and I feel that’s one thing that we’re making an attempt to consider right here shouldn’t be each app is a minutes-of-usage engagement app or visits per day engagement app. It’s about have been you there in the meanwhile of fact and the way good have been you? Serious about merchandise that approach is a good way to actually serve the client.

My instance of doing that’s we discovered that from Nordstrom, proper? In case you take one thing again to Nordstrom it’s an unimaginable expertise. I don’t spend my life taking clothes again to Nordstrom, however I’m glad once I do. It’s incredible, and I keep in mind that.

Good to assume in your merchandise. Are you a second of fact product or are you an engagement product? Do you transition from one to do the opposite, or do you keep in that area?

Michael Krigsman: I’ve a query for each of you. By the best way, I used to be remiss in not stating that at the moment is Brian Solis’s birthday. Not solely that, Brian simply hopped off a aircraft from India, ran residence, and jumped on this CxOTalk. Brian, completely happy birthday! [Laughter] How on the planet did you survive India after which from right here?

Chris Satchell: Yeah. Comfortable birthday, Brian. But in addition, now that he stated that, you look so a lot better than I do; it’s disgusting.

Brian Solis: [Laughter]

Michael Krigsman: I used to be considering he appears higher than me too.

Brian Solis: [Laughter] The key is that–

Chris Satchell: It’s make-up, isn’t it?

Brian Solis: Champagne.  Truly champagne.

Michael Krigsman: The champagne. Proper. Precisely. There you go. [Laughter]

Brian Solis: [Laughter] Thanks, Michael. Thanks, Chris.

Michael Krigsman: Anyway, right here’s my query. Chris, you have been simply describing an strategy to product improvement, putting the buyer first, and that requires empathy. You’re a big group. Brian, you’ve been learning giant organizations, taking a look at that have.

For individuals listening, how do you institutionalize? How can a corporation institutionalize that type of empathy perspective when surrounding everyone that works inside an organization is the press of spreadsheets and MBAs? Save two cents there and, should you do this, it can save you 5 cents. However wait, however what concerning the clients? Save the 5 cents.

Brian, perhaps begin with you. How do you institutionalize that?

Chris Satchell: Properly, I’ve this joke that I attempted to be revolutionary as soon as, however I acquired caught in conferences all day.

Michael Krigsman: [Laughter]

Brian Solis: [Laughter] The truth is that, as Chris stated, a lot of that is–I hate to make use of the phrase, nevertheless it’s so true–political. I discovered that the 5 commonest hurdles in making an attempt to institutionalize any of this are all human challenges, issues like worry, ego, sabotage, self-preservation. Truly, there’s greater than 5, however I needed to attempt to categorize it for a matter of simplicity. It’s a matter of juggling.

What Chris stated have been the nuances of it. You must converse a standard language. You need to deliver individuals to the desk in a protected method. You must present that there’s larger return than simply the inherent advantages of making an attempt to be revolutionary or making an attempt to be digitally reworked. Extra so, you need to step out of your position and understand that should you’re ready for somebody to inform you what to do, you’re on the mistaken aspect of innovation. These individuals, I name them change brokers, however they go by many different names.

Change comes from the center more often than not, and it’s actually serving to individuals see that each one of this alteration that’s occurring on the surface is definitely for the betterment of everyone. It’s simply that we’re coping with people that we’re simply coming down to vary administration points, actually. I feel should you may give change administration a function the place individuals can see that their work truly has an influence on this entrance, then you will have a begin. However, there isn’t a straightforward reply to this. Chris, you reside it each day, so perhaps you have got some extra tangible issues to share.

Chris Satchell: It’s fascinating you speak about we’re an enormous firm, however typically you take a look at my group. We’re nonetheless a fairly large group. It actually isn’t like that. It’s not one huge group. It’s 40, 50, 60 squads with product administration, with design, with improvement. These product managers are inspired to know their buyer, to take a look at the stats coming in on the merchandise, to take a look at the analysis research, to exit into the sector and journey with our techs and see what occurs with the client, to take heed to calls by means of our name facilities. There are many methods to do these contact factors that may hold these groups actually targeted on their space.

I feel the opposite factor you need to do is management. It’s worthwhile to give these individuals cowl. Once I speak about a context that permits individuals to achieve success, it’s about that. What we attempt to encourage the product managers and the dev groups is don’t fear concerning the enterprise but. Perhaps there are key, key enterprise necessities we’ve got to take onboard as we take into consideration a product, however don’t fear about the way it monetizes. Don’t fear about the fee. Let’s construct the proper factor and provide you with the suitable designs.

I feel one other one is to inform individuals to not censor themselves too early. I’ve been in periods earlier than the place you’re brainstorming one thing new, and everyone is self-editing. They’re like, “Nicely, I don’t assume the enterprise would go for that. Our authorized goes to inform us no.” I feel one of many issues that assistance is you say, “Look. After we get out of this assembly, there’s a whole world of individuals whose job are designed to inform you no, to chop down the thought, to make it tenable for all these totally different methods in your organization, so don’t edit your self. You’ve acquired an entire group to try this for you. Let’s begin considering nice concepts and maintain driving for them.”

Then I feel what you want is management that is aware of when to actually push and says, “I perceive what these enterprise necessities are. They’re flawed. We should always spend extra.” Let me interrupt myself as a result of what I’ve discovered with a variety of disagreements between product and the enterprise, it’s not that when you speak concerning the very finish objective and no timelines you disagree. Businesspeople need to serve the client as nicely. It’s not like they’re these evil individuals. They actually need to give an excellent service as properly.

What occurs is you speak about two totally different timelines, typically. You’ll say, “Hey, I need to do these nice merchandise,” and also you’re considering how I’m going to stay it subsequent yr, after which two years after that. I’ve received this five-year roadmap for the product. Yeah, I do know I’m going to have to vary it as a result of shoppers change yearly, however I’ve received these massive concepts.

The enterprise may be considering, “I’ve acquired constraints this quarter. I’ve obtained constraints this half of this yr.” Typically you’ll be able to agree on an endpoint, after which it’s actually about the way you prioritize in between. I feel it’s excellent to be sure to’re speaking about time horizon, however then typically you’ve simply obtained to return and say, “I’m going to struggle for the suitable factor for the client even when it seems just like the mistaken enterprise proper now as a result of, if I take a look at the long-term worth of the client, this can pay dividends. Very occasionally does anyone get chastised within the long-term by shoppers for doing the proper factor for shoppers, and so that you’ve simply obtained to be able to battle for that.

Michael Krigsman: We have now a few feedback from Twitter, a few questions. They’re actually the identical query. Shelly Lucas and Arsalan Khan are each asking in several methods, how do you empower managers to make these sorts of selections that you simply’re describing, to face up to the company pressures to do the appropriate factor? How do you do this?

Chris Satchell: What we do is we arrange processes that assist them. I’ll scrub that in a second. Additionally, it truly is concerning the layers of management. You need to present these individuals that you’ve confidence in them. We allow them to outline their options. We allow them to go and analysis it. You’ll be able to check it with shoppers. And, we allow them to construct it.

One of many largest types of mental units of hubris you’ll be able to see from management is believing you all the time know the best reply since you’re not as near the issue, typically, because the individuals which might be constructing it. And so, you need to be prepared to say, “You understand what? That’s not what I might have achieved.” However what I might recommend you do, “It’s not higher. It’s simply totally different, so let’s go together with your concept since you spent extra time and analysis on it.”

One is simply giving folks that safety. It’s additionally that elevation. If you say, “Hey, we’ve received an exec assessment,” you’ll be able to deliver the individuals in that really have the thought. Or, it is perhaps a time if you don’t convey them in since you’re simply going to defend their concepts, you’re going to push again exhausting, and also you don’t need an viewers doing that.

One of many issues that we’ve completed that’s actually helped empower the groups–and it’s going to sound actually boring, nevertheless it’s so necessary–is we’ve got this quarterly planning course of. It’s how we take our annual objectives for our portfolio and break it into quarters. Each quarter what we do is, the merchandise managers, they get with all their stakeholders, wherever they’re, together with consumer analysis and what they need to do, they usually write. They are saying, “For my space, here’s a one-page spec of what I need to do,” and it’s one thing that may be achieved in 1 / 4 for his or her finish of the product or their product.

It says, “Right here’s all of the groups’ assist I want.” What we do is we’ve this course of the place we stack rank them. Then we plan, and we simply plan from prime to backside, ensuring that any greater precedence factor, you realize, it fills assets in first so we don’t get kind of that hanging chad syndrome widespread in improvement. There are 2,000 individuals in my group, and there are one other eight,000 individuals we work with. What you don’t need to have occur is you begin off on one thing and then you definitely discover out one of many constituent groups can’t cope with the capability constraints for that quarter, and you may’t ship something.

We solved that drawback, however importantly, it provides all of your companions someplace to go. Once they say mid-quarter, “We’d wish to go on this path,” or, “We need to change what’s occurring,” you say, “Nice. Speak to your product supervisor. In the event that they like the thought, they will convey it to the subsequent planning.”

It’s a means that we have now managed to sort of deliver quarterly agility to annual planning. What we do is we solely schedule 50% of our capability that method. We name it “directed.” We do 50% of what we name “trusted capability” the place we simply say to the scrum groups, “Hey, work your backlog. Put in your backlog what you realize that you simply want, what the client wants. That’s your capability to handle. Go handle it.” We work very arduous to carve off a part of their capability that they might simply use to do the best factor. It’s taken us virtually a yr and a half of fixed effort to get that to work, nevertheless it actually has helped us take the 36 groups that we’re feeding into video and truly make them extra agile and coordinate throughout them. It’s agile writ giant at a really huge scale.

Michael Krigsman: Brian, Chris was simply speaking about two various things, in a way. One is type of the qualitative features of institutionalizing that empathy and concentrate on the client. Then he was simply alluding to extra quantitative approaches when it comes to course of and construction. The query that I’ve is, as you’ve been researching this, Brian, are there metrics, KPIs that may assist individuals take into consideration, once more, embedding this and institutionalizing this type of mind-set, customer-centric considering in agile product improvement and so forth?

Brian Solis: I feel I’m going to show this right into a two-part reply the place the primary half I’ll reply after which I’ll defer to Chris to share what he can about a few of the metrics that he’s utilizing as a result of what I’ve observed is, in my analysis, that is instantly tied to company tradition. How the corporate works, the management infrastructure, the administration infrastructure, it has to see and speak about issues in a different way. It’s simply the character of how the corporate works. Metrics, you continue to have your onerous metrics which have to point out ROI and KPIs that result in that ROI; however to get there, that’s the actual story.

I’ll inform you that, in lots of instances, I discovered that change brokers have discovered that not solely does ROI stand for return on funding; it additionally stands for return on ignorance. What occurs if we don’t do that?

Chris Satchell: [Laughter]

Brian Solis: What’s that value? What can we show out that exhibits that these investments will yield this now and over time? It’s actually making an attempt to vary individuals’s views and mindsets of what return truly appears like. It opens their thoughts as a result of, in lots of instances, executives don’t know what they don’t know.

I need to consider that Chris is true that folks need to do the best factor, that they’re not evil in some ways. The truth is that many executives truly simply don’t reside the life the best way or reside the corporate the best way that their clients and staff do. I used to name this the Undercover Boss second, for those who ever watch that present, which [laughter] I really like as a result of it’s all the time inspiring, however it has the identical ending each episode. That’s, once you put an government within the footwear of an worker or a buyer, they will’t assist however really feel the empathy of what another person has to undergo on a day-to-day foundation. It opens their eyes to see what’s attainable.

We have now proper now such a definite distinction between how clients are evolving and staff are evolving and the way executives are going day-to-day when it comes to what they’re reporting and what they’re driving. Somebody has to bridge that hole. A part of what Chris was referring to when it comes to talking the language or the widespread language, or what I name talking the language of the C-suite, is that you must put these numbers collectively. You need to be many issues.

I say on this analysis report on The Change Agent’s Manifesto is that you must be not only a politician, but in addition a lawyer and in addition a knowledge storyteller in that you need to deliver all of those various things collectively that present what somebody wants to listen to and the way they should hear it tied along with numbers, tied along with proof, tied along with potential outcomes and potential outcomes so that everyone concerned can consider in your work. Chris, I’ll allow you to end that and what you’re measuring.

Chris Satchell: Yeah, it’s fascinating. I don’t know, for all of us in new improvement, however right here’s a controversial assertion. I feel it’s completely pointless measuring ROI under the portfolio degree for a given line of enterprise. I typically have some very spirited discussions with our finance workforce round this. The reason being, we’ve received all these tasks. They’re feeding into the general expertise the buyer will get. Then the buyer, particularly in our enterprise, has obtained a subscription they’re holding due to that.

When anyone involves me and says, “Nicely, we have to know precisely what it prices,” I’m going, “Why do it’s essential know what it prices? You realize what the portfolio prices.”

They’re like, “Properly, so we will plan ROI.” I’m like, “How on earth have you learnt what the return is? There isn’t a approach to un-entangle these variables. That’s unimaginable. It’s mathematically unimaginable. We don’t have that precision.”

And so, I feel one of many issues is when individuals begin measuring ROI. Measure it at an applicable degree. The extent I feel is acceptable is: Right here’s what we spend money on a enterprise, and right here’s what that enterprise returns. In the event you begin taking a look at options, and also you begin taking a look at product extensions and all these different issues, and saying, “Nicely, we’d like an ROI,” I feel you’re type of lacking the purpose within the trendy world. I feel you should take a look at complete funding, complete return. That clears up sort of truly lots of the mess should you can persuade individuals of that as a result of I discover that lots of organizations love, would truly a lot want, to be exactly incorrect and usually proper as a result of it provides them this sense of, “Properly, they have to be on it as a result of they’ve acquired all these detailed numbers.”

Nicely, the detailed numbers are a fiction. We don’t actually understand how the client will obtain it. How many people actually see ROI projections that basically pan out?

Now, large-cap scale funding and capital funding, that’s a unique matter. You possibly can truly plan that. However, in terms of consumer-based merchandise, I simply don’t assume, aside from the road of enterprise, you’ll be able to actually plan it. The primary one is, in the event you can, don’t get caught within the recreation of ROI for small issues. Speak about portfolio ROI.

Then what we measure actually relies upon. You’ve received your vainness stats since you sort of need to know your inhabitants and what your month-to-month actives are and your distinctive customers. However past that, it’s a must to measure, one, what you assume is admittedly necessary. Should you’re in a second of fact, it is advisable measure success throughout a second of fact. Perhaps it is advisable measure internet promoter rating one aspect then the opposite.

Meaning you must run experiments, take individuals by means of a brand new expertise and measure what their internet promoter rating was on the finish versus the web promoter rating of individuals on the previous path.

We’ve got this concept of relationship internet promoter rating, so RNPS, which is the long-term [of] how you are feeling. Then TNPS, which is, by means of a transaction, how did you are feeling? Then aside from that it’s, you’ve acquired to return again to the product groups. It’s like all good knowledge science. KPI is not any totally different. What query do you might want to reply? You must take into consideration the questions you’ll want to reply after which plan for the info to reply these questions.

From a improvement perspective, it’s nice to place the infrastructure in to have the ability to say, “I would like real-time stats. I would like batch stats. I’ve obtained these various things that I need to get again from my software to make it very straightforward for builders to instrument.”  Whereas, product is available in and says, “Might you discover this stuff out for me?”  They’re like, “Yeah, that’s straightforward. I can simply go and add that.”

Past that, it actually relies upon [on] what you’re making an attempt to reply for that query. In the event you’ve acquired a funnel drawback with, “Hey, how do I monitor from when any person downloads an software, how many individuals undergo, arrange an account, they usually watch that first video and go to the second video?” That’s very totally different than saying, “I need to perceive the warmth map of how someone strikes by way of our consumer expertise.”  We’d say in England, “Horses for programs,” however it actually is about understanding the query; design your knowledge feeds and your knowledge evaluation for the reply.

Michael Krigsman: Let’s truly speak tech for a second because you introduced up knowledge, which is such an fascinating matter. Brian, leap in as properly. How can organizations use knowledge within the service of buyer expertise, within the service of digital transformation? The place do you get that knowledge, and the way does Comcast, how do you consider knowledge? I do know you’ve simply been speaking about that slightly bit.

Chris Satchell: We’ve large quantities of knowledge throughout every little thing, whether or not it’s our merchandise. You possibly can solely vaguely think about how a lot knowledge our community produces. We’re utilizing it in some ways. We use it operationally to maintain the service operating, to offer clients a terrific service. We additionally use it, as I stated, to reply product questions, to know the place we should always go subsequent in our merchandise.

Increasingly more, we have now a really robust machine studying, synthetic intelligence, and deep studying set of core groups right here, and so we’re utilizing that knowledge to not solely type of discover out new insights to have the ability to acknowledge in our merchandise; we’re utilizing that knowledge to truly create new product experiences you could solely create with these clever strategies. Then the identical with operations, feeding knowledge in and on the lookout for that kind of sample matching recognition and subsequent motion suggestion that you could solely do through the use of very deep networks to have the ability to acknowledge all this knowledge coming in.

We’re beginning to use knowledge as a strategy to truly change how we function and as a core of how we construct and the performance our merchandise ship. I feel that’s going to develop into widespread to many corporations. You’ll begin. Knowledge will turn into a part of the product. I feel what we’re discovering is the algorithms which are out there have gotten a commodity. You will get nice knowledge algorithms all over the place.

The precise know-how frameworks–whether or not it’s MXNet, whether or not it’s TensorFlow–evaluation and modeling frameworks have gotten a commodity. The actual factor you’ve got as an organization is your knowledge. The fashions you construct with that knowledge, that’s your secret sauce. That’s your gold. We’re very targeted on, how can we use our knowledge successfully? It’s extra of a query of capability. We’ve infinite quantities of nice questions and issues we will do. It’s simply sequencing them by means of product improvement, by means of product insights, by way of community operations and buyer expertise to have the ability to get probably the most invaluable issues accomplished first.

I feel we all the time speak about huge knowledge. Now we’re speaking about A.I. and machine studying, however all of that–let’s simply keep in mind–they’re simply instruments. With out nice individuals considering nice concepts, with out with the ability to truly develop it, with out truly with the ability to take the insights or the info and have the actuation loop to actually have an effect on issues, there’s no level amassing it.

I imply I used to joke that what would occur is, within the massive knowledge world, you’d have a board of director that claims, “We’d like knowledge.” Dutifully, the corporate would go off and collect, like, large quantities of knowledge. Then they might say, “Nicely, nothing is occurring,” and they also go, “Ah, we’d like extra knowledge!” So that you get even greater knowledge.

You then understand just a little bit later, you’ve obtained no insights from it, so that you begin constructing the perception engine. You might have this, like, large first bit, after which it narrows to insights. Then nonetheless nothing occurs. Everyone is scratching their heads, and you then understand actuation. There was no pathway to take the outcomes we had and truly change the world based mostly on that. You sort of need it to look extra like a pipe the place your insights match your evaluation match your means to actuate.

The final level I’ll say on that’s the hassle is a lot of individuals are very opinionated. They used to, within the previous world, say, “Nicely, that is my opinion, and so let’s go do it.”

Brian Solis: [Laughter]

Chris Satchell: You then say, “Nicely, we’re going to turn out to be a data-driven group,” and what they actually imply is, “I’m going to be a data-driven group until I disagree with the info. Then all of a sudden I’m going to problem the info, not my considering.”

There’s a cultural factor the place you actually need to start out with the ability to verify your ego and say, “Wow. I’m stunned. I had an perception. My perception was fallacious, however I’ve acquired a brand new perception. Let’s go drive that.” If you will get these to line up, you possibly can truly begin making a change within the org.

Michael Krigsman: Brian Solis, as you look throughout many organizations, this position of knowledge, what are you seeing? What do you recommend? I really like this notion of knowledge being the important thing as a result of algorithms are a commodity.

Brian Solis: [Laughter] Yeah, I imply it’s one of many the reason why I’m vice chairman of the Chris Satchell fan membership.

Chris Satchell: [Laughter]

Brian Solis: I feel I report back to his spouse, who’s the president of the fan membership.

Chris Satchell: [Laughter]

Brian Solis: However, you recognize, he nailed it proper. I imply he’s been nailing every part. However, proper there on the finish, it’s the most important problem I’ve seen knowledge meet. That is throughout the board in any dialog is that, keep in mind, the challenges for any of this are human. Actually, what you’ve gotten is that you simply’re working towards a profession lengthy of experiences which might be behind each government, or behind each decision-maker that you simply’re working with, in that they obtained to that position of the place they’re as a result of they’ve made nice selections alongside the best way. These selections have fortified their experiences and have validated their beliefs and their views.

What you’re actually making an attempt to do is problem conference. That is the place it will get very troublesome as a result of knowledge solely reinforces what you need to see or what you anticipate to see, and so it’s a must to. This is among the the reason why I say being a knowledge storyteller and having widespread language is that you’ve to have the ability to get knowledge to inform the story of what’s truly occurring based mostly on an assumption that’s going to problem the conference. That is the artwork of it, and that is the place it will get very troublesome as a result of what you’re primarily doing is making an attempt to use a Jedi thoughts trick to somebody who doesn’t need to be improper in a method that you simply get them to really feel that they’re a part of the answer and that, ultimately, form, or type that they’re validated on this path.

I imply simply apply this to any dialog about politics on Fb at this time. It’s very totally different to say, “That is what I feel, and that is what another person is considering.” They’ll come again and say, “Wow, you’ve utterly modified my thoughts. Thanks for that.”

Michael Krigsman: [Laughter]

Brian Solis: I imply that simply by no means occurs.

The opposite factor, too, is that the story is greater than, I feel, anybody is actually capable of comprehend. What Chris talked about earlier and what I’d like to type of return to sooner or later is that NPS is a type of issues that validate a part of the story and may validate the previous story or can validate the brand new story. Chris has used moments of fact, which is one thing I’m an enormous believer in.

For those who take a look at the right definition of buyer expertise, or worker expertise for that matter, it’s the sum of all engagements somebody has together with your group all through the complete journey and all through the lifecycle. It’s not nearly anybody second. It’s about how all these moments come collectively.

What I attempt to use knowledge for, and in addition metrics–coming again to that time–is one thing that I’ve discovered from an excellent good friend of mine named Thomas Marzano at Philips the place you’ve created primarily an expertise move the place you’ve taken all of these key moments of fact. You’ve designed what these experiences must be, how they parlay into each little bit of it, and it doesn’t simply play out right into a move. It additionally performs out into what’s the messaging, what’s the packaging, what’s the help infrastructure appear to be, what do the insurance policies seem like?

You’re constructing out this entire factor the place NPS, or no matter metrics you need to use–as Chris talked about, you look transactionally and in addition general–you’re now beginning to measure for what I name expertise structure. What’s the expertise that somebody is meant to have? That’s the design. We’re not speaking a few model fashion information. We’re not speaking about company imaginative and prescient or mission. We’re speaking concerning the human emotion, and we’ll measure these feelings by the reactions that they’ve and what occurs subsequent.

Primarily, what I really feel is ironic, but in addition lovely on the similar time, is that A.I. and machine studying and deep studying are permitting us to humanize all of those elements, leaning on know-how to truly humanize these experiences that somebody has to say, “That is the usual of which we need to ship, and now let’s design for that.”

I’ve two questions that I need to sort of flop again over to Chris. One is, how did you get to what’s primarily turning into an expertise circulate, and the way did you get individuals to see that? Then the second half is, how did you get to this agile-like group?

I doc digital transformation in six levels. Comcast is up there on the prime of the levels, however you needed to get there from some extent that was earlier than your time that was nowhere near the fourth, fifth, or sixth stage. I feel individuals would need to hear two issues about expertise stream, which I feel is a part of the story of how you bought individuals to the desk. Then secondly, how you bought executives to help an agile infrastructure.

Chris Satchell: The expertise movement aspect, a few of it, I feel, we received to and I obtained to personally from sort of simply arduous classes. I can return a few corporations, and I can take into consideration this. Right here’s what kind of threw me into expertise stream. You construct the subsequent era of your app, the subsequent launch, and it’s nice. It’s higher than the present one.

You set it within the app retailer, and the scores go means down. That’s onerous. We actually examined it. We thought it was nice. You then go learn the feedback, and also you understand the feedback are actually score your improve cycle or your improve path, not the precise app when you’re in there.

There are feedback, “Oh, it made me log in once more.” “Oh, it nuked my preferences.” “Oh, I’ve to reattach one thing or re-log into one other service.”

What they’re actually saying is, “You thought too narrowly about what the appliance was. You thought the expertise was simply, ‘Properly, all the things is sweet. Now, I iterate via and I get to do one thing.’” It’s like, “No. You need to take into consideration what’s it like whenever you improve? What’s it like whenever you purchase that software? How do you get into it? How do you study concerning the software, to start with? How do you even decide the appliance?

As you bought these onerous classes, you begin spanning out from the core expertise in every course, and also you’re saying, “Nicely, cling on. The world is greater than I assumed.” If each contact level is giving an impression of our model and of our providers, oh pricey as a result of I’ve not been managing two-thirds of it.

One of many messages that we give to product managers is, it’s a must to assume all the best way from the start. Take into consideration even when the individual doesn’t even know they’ve a necessity for it. How are you going to inform them about that? How do they really discontinue the connection with that software, and the way would they go and be a promoter? Can the app assist them do this?

It means you’ve obtained to measure within the area. Your job as a product supervisor doesn’t end when the factor is launched. You then begin actively measuring what’s occurring within the area, and also you’ve received to react to that each on the concepts you had for the subsequent model plus this. In a method, you need to begin mapping out all of the factors in an expertise journey.

Positive, when you think about this on a bit of paper, in all probability the engagement bit, when you’ve gone by way of acquisition and also you’ve arrange and also you’re able to go, it’s in all probability obtained probably the most flows inside it, however you sort of have to consider how they work collectively. How would they advocate this to any person else? How do you get them re-engaged?

In the event that they do need to depart, how do you’ve gotten a pleasant, clear exit relationship? I feel that ought to be nice as properly. There’s no level making it troublesome for any person. That simply type of annoys them. It’s like, “Hey, you’ve determined to go away since you perhaps don’t like one thing or perhaps it’s not helpful. On the best way out, we’re going to kick you a bit as a result of we expect that may make you a promoter after this.” It’s, “Hey, if we simply maintain kicking you, you’ll keep.” It’s a foolish method to consider how individuals interact.

One is, you simply have to start out within the center and assume broad. You simply have to inform your product managers, inform your builders, maintain considering broadly and maintain asking the query, “Properly, what would occur then? What occurs if I don’t have this?”

I want I might keep in mind who to attribute this to. Brian, you may keep in mind. It’s that present me how a lot you care about your edge instances, and I’ll present you ways a lot you care about your buyer.  That is among the sorts of little insidious issues about MVP. Individuals took MVP to imply, “Oh, I’m simply going to do my core expertise, and I gained’t fear about all the sting instances.”

I feel that time period ought to have died about seven years in the past as a result of now shoppers would not have the time or endurance. In the event you’re not desirous about that journey, in case you’re not serious about edge instances, you’ve obtained sort of a minute now, perhaps two, to persuade individuals to maintain utilizing your software. Should you haven’t considered your onboard journey, and also you’ll see app builders actually do that nicely now, however should you’ve not considered it, when you’re not eager about the way you get in or how you’ve got an efficient first couple of minutes which are orchestrated to make it nice and the way you go on to your subsequent expertise, you’re going to lose individuals. You possibly can’t simply have an MVP anymore. We like to speak about having MLP, like minimal lovable product.

On the agile aspect, let’s give my boss, Tony Werner, plenty of credit score. He actually took Comcast from being an aggregator, and integrator, to a full know-how store. Our ex-CTO, Shree Kotay, he did a fantastic job of championing agile. Then I feel the extra individuals you usher in, and as we introduced individuals in from all different industries, as we maintain hiring from nice universities, individuals simply anticipate that agile is the best way you’re going to work.

For us, we’ve got to have steady supply. We’ve to have a really speedy launch. There’s no different approach. Our merchandise are too massive to attempt to have, like, monolithic releases or waterfall. You need to permit dash groups to launch independently. Perhaps into the identical car, however they’ve to have the ability to launch their code individually.

That simply turns into actually necessary for velocity, and I feel we expect lots about velocity. I’ll offer you an instance. We’ve acquired a program referred to as RDK, and it’s the firmware for all of our units. We open supply it. There are about 700 corporations which are onboard utilizing it.

One of many causes we do it, the primary cause is, we will change our firmware, and we do change our firmware and our hardware each two weeks. Now, we do a number of releases in between, and we take them to five%. We verify in the event that they’re fixing the issues we thought or including the performance appropriately. However, each two weeks we’re rolling a full firmware launch throughout our hardware footprint. We will’t do this until we have now agile groups and we management that code. All the things we do is about up for these groups to have the ability to ship shortly.

I feel one of many good issues about Comcast is we had an government staff–Brian, Neil Smit when he was the COO, now Dave because the COO, and Tony–that believed in us and stated, “Nicely, so long as you retain producing nice outcomes, we don’t actually thoughts the way you manage improvement,” so we’re always tweaking it to make it nice for our employees and make it productive.

We simply say, “Concentrate on the outcomes. Look how briskly we will get issues out. Look how a lot we’re producing. Take a look at the standard. Don’t give attention to our improvement strategies. Simply allow us to fear about that in improvement.”

Michael Krigsman: Unbelievable! We’re previous time. We’re out of time. We’re executed. This has passed by so shortly. However, as we go to the top, Brian, you’re going to have the final phrase, however fast, fast, fast. Then, Chris, one other various is we might simply perhaps do that for an additional hour or two.


Michael Krigsman:[Laughter] Brian, you’ve obtained the final phrase, in a short time, although – very fast.

Brian Solis: All proper, Chris. I’m simply going to show this to you for a fast, fast, fast reply. That’s, I speak typically concerning the distinction between iteration and innovation. Many corporations assume they’re being revolutionary, however they’re truly being iterative, which I describe as doing the identical factor, however higher, whereas innovation is doing new issues that create new worth.

I take a look at the Comcast or the Xfinity distant as type of this metaphor for the 2. Buttons are iterative: backlit keys, devoted buttons. Then the voice, the entire infrastructure for voice was revolutionary. How did you get the corporate to see the distinction between the 2?

Michael Krigsman: Chris, actually fast as a result of we’re out of time. We’re previous time.

Chris Satchell: It’s a continuum, so I feel small iteration is simply micro innovation. You want innovation that’s small. You want innovation that’s medium the place you’re increasing merchandise. You want improvements doing utterly new issues, and you’ve got individuals devoted throughout that point continuum.

Michael Krigsman: All proper, that was fast. Actually, this has been a quick dialog. I positive want we had extra time. Chris Satchell, you’re government vice chairman and chief product officer at Comcast. I hope you’ll come again and do that once more one other time.

Chris Satchell: Would like to.

Michael Krigsman: Brian Solis, you’re one of many prime researchers on change and digital transformation on the planet. We’re honored that you’re again once more, and I hope you’ll come again and do that one other time as nicely.

Brian Solis: Yeah, completely.

Michael Krigsman: Pricey, viewers members, we hope you’ll undoubtedly come again. [Laughter]

Subsequent week on CxOTalk, subsequent Friday, we’re talking with Michael Chui, who runs McKinsey International Institute. That’s the analysis arm of McKinsey. When he does analysis on the longer term and he does analysis on synthetic intelligence, man, he’s the man to take heed to.

Everyone, thanks a lot for watching CxOTalk. Come again quickly. Make sure you like us on Fb. Don’t overlook that. So long, everyone. Bye-bye.

About the author